Introduction to Advanced Corrugated Box Solutions

Beer products require robust protection. Their journey from brewery to consumer involves many challenges. This report explores advanced corrugated packaging solutions. These solutions protect beer effectively. We examine material science, structural engineering, and performance validation. We also consider application-specific demands. This report defines what state-of-the-art protective packaging means today. We start with a deep look at materials. These include high-performance linerboards, fluting mediums, and functional coatings. Bio-adhesives enhance barrier properties and sustainability. We then move to structural engineering. These principles turn materials into strong three-dimensional containers. They manage complex static and dynamic loads during distribution.

A key finding here highlights a growing problem. Standardized lab tests often miss actual hazards. This is especially true in modern distribution channels. The high-touchpoint Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) environment presents unique risks. We show how real-world sensor data helps bridge this gap. Advanced Finite Element Analysis (FEA) creates more predictive validation methods. It also enables optimized designs. The report compares unique packaging needs for different channels. This includes D2C versus B2B retail. We also look at different product formats like glass bottles versus aluminum cans. This highlights the need for tailored solutions for every corrugated box.

Furthermore, we provide a multi-criteria competitive benchmark. It assesses optimized corrugated solutions against alternatives. These alternatives include molded pulp and reusable High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) crates. This evaluation uses a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) framework. It reveals that reusable options play a role. However, advanced single-use corrugated box packaging often offers a better balance. It provides superior protection, cost-effectiveness, and lifecycle sustainability. This holds true, especially when considering reverse logistics.

Finally, the report looks at emerging innovations. These include advancements in lightweighting. Bio-based materials like lignin and PHA show great promise. The integration of intelligent sensors allows real-time monitoring. Circular economy models continue to evolve. This includes the developing field of reusable corrugated systems. The main conclusion is clear. The future of beer packaging demands a holistic, data-driven approach. This approach leverages material and structural innovation. It creates solutions that protect products. It also remains cost-effective and verifiably sustainable.

Corrugated Box Materials and Composition for Performance

A corrugated box‘s performance depends on its constituent materials. The science behind these materials is fundamental. Specifying linerboard, fluting medium, adhesives, and coatings is a complex process. It aims to achieve specific performance goals. These goals range from moisture resistance to compression strength. We also balance economic and sustainability constraints.

Linerboard and Fluting Medium Selection for Corrugated Box

Paper components give a corrugated box its primary strength and character. Choosing between virgin kraft liner and recycled liner is a key decision. Virgin kraft offers superior strength, stiffness, and a consistent surface. This is important for printing and coating adhesion. However, recycled linerboard has significantly improved its quality. It provides substantial sustainability and cost advantages. Recycled fiber presents a key challenge: its inherent variability and shorter fiber length. These factors impact tensile strength and surface energy.

Coating performance heavily relies on the substrate’s surface energy. For bio-based coatings like Polylactic Acid (PLA), strong bonding is crucial. Fiber tear upon separation often indicates this strong bond. This requires careful management of extrusion temperatures and surface treatments. This is especially true for more variable recycled liners. This interaction is vital for creating an effective barrier. It protects against moisture or abrasion.

Performance-Enhancing Adhesives in Corrugated Box Construction

The adhesive, or “starch,” binds the liner to the fluted medium. It is vital for the corrugated box‘s structural integrity. This is particularly true for its resistance to shear forces. It also prevents delamination in humid environments. Traditional starch-based adhesives are cost-effective. Yet, they pose a vulnerability in high-humidity conditions.

To solve this, significant research focuses on bio-based adhesive formulations. A key trend involves developing cross-linked bio-adhesives. These incorporate renewable cross-linking agents. They dramatically improve bond strength and humidity resistance. These advanced adhesives directly boost Edge Crush Test (ECT) and Box Compression Test (BCT) values. This ensures performance in challenging climates. Furthermore, lignin, a plentiful paper and biorefinery byproduct, shows promise. It is becoming a valuable component in adhesive formulations. Including lignin improves the mechanical strength and water resistance of the final corrugated box. It offers a sustainable path to enhanced performance.

Functional and Bio-Based Coatings for Corrugated Box

Coatings transform a standard corrugated box into a high-performance material. This material can resist moisture, grease, and abrasion. Historically, polyethylene (PE) or wax coatings achieved this. However, these materials complicate recyclability. They often contaminate the paper stream. The industry is rapidly shifting. It now favors functional, repulpable, and compostable bio-based coatings.

• Polylactic Acid (PLA): PLA, a biopolyester from agricultural sources, is a leading alternative. Applied through extrusion coating, it significantly improves mechanical and barrier properties. Innovations in PLA blends combine PLA with other biopolymers. Nanofillers like nanoclays are also used. These yield coatings with superior moisture and grease resistance. They become competitive with PE. Incorporating grafted Cellulose Nanofibers (CNF) into a PLA coating drastically reduces the Water Vapor Transmission Rate (WVTR). This is crucial for beverage packaging facing condensation.
• Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA): PHA coatings offer an emerging solution for higher thermal stability. This applies to packaging for pasteurized products or those shipped through hot climates. PHA is currently more expensive than PLA. However, it offers a higher melting point and is biodegradable. Research aims to produce PHA from waste streams. This could significantly lower its cost.
• Lignin-Based Barriers: Lignin also provides barrier properties. Lignin-based coatings increase linerboard burst strength by up to 15%. They reduce water absorption by over 60%. This provides a sustainable alternative to conventional sizing agents and petroleum-based barriers.
• Regulatory Drivers: Regulatory pressures accelerate the shift to these bio-based solutions. The global phase-out of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in food-contact packaging is a prime example. This creates a strong market demand for compliant, high-performance grease and moisture barriers. These barriers come from renewable sources.

The end-of-life characteristics of these materials drive their adoption. Coatings and adhesives with commercial or home compostability certifications offer a distinct market advantage. These certifications come from organizations like BPI or TÜV AUSTRIA. However, ensuring compatibility with traditional paper recycling streams remains a key challenge. The industry actively pursues this “dual-track” end-of-life concept.

Corrugated Box Structural Engineering for Load Management

Converting a flat, two-dimensional corrugated sheet into a protective three-dimensional structure is an engineering feat. Designers optimize the corrugated box‘s geometry, internal components, and joints. This manages both static loads, like warehouse stacking, and dynamic loads, such as shock and vibration during transit.

Flute Profiles and Box Geometry for Effective Shipping Box

The flute profile forms the foundation of a corrugated box‘s protective capability. Choosing the right flute involves crucial trade-offs. Flute sizes range from larger profiles like B-flute (approx. 2.5 mm) and C-flute (approx. 3.6 mm) to microflutes like E-flute (approx. 1.2 mm) or F-flute (approx. 0.8 mm).

• B and C flutes provide superior cushioning due to their larger geometry. They offer greater energy absorption during impacts. They also significantly contribute to the box’s top-to-bottom compression strength. This is the Box Compression Test (BCT) value. These flutes are ideal for heavy loads and high stacking.
• E and F microflutes offer a much smoother, higher-quality printing surface. They allow for more intricate die-cutting. Their thinner profile reduces overall package dimensions (caliper). This improves cube efficiency in shipping box applications. However, they provide less inherent cushioning and compression strength compared to larger flutes.

Overall box geometry also matters. Options include a Regular Slotted Container (RSC) or a Full Overlap (FOL) container. Designers select the geometry based on required stacking strength and closure integrity. Joint construction, whether glued or stitched, critically impacts overall structural performance.

Internal Partitions and Dividers for Primary Product Protection

Internal partitions are as crucial as the outer container for beer packaging, especially for glass bottles. Their main purpose is to prevent bottle-to-bottle contact. This contact can cause chipping, breakage, or label damage.

• Material and Flute Orientation: Partitions typically use the same corrugated or solid fiberboard as the corrugated box. For maximum stacking strength, partitions should have a vertical flute orientation. This means the flutes run parallel to the bottles. This allows partitions to act as load-bearing columns. They transfer top-load pressure through the structure to the base. This prevents pressure on the bottle crowns.
• Structural Design: “A-style” or full-height partitions are considered the best for protection. They extend to the full height of the bottles. This ensures complete separation from base to neck. To protect vulnerable neck and shoulder areas, high-performance partitions often include die-cut features. These include scalloped edges or chamfered corners at cell intersections. These features create a clearance pocket. They prevent sharp edge contact with the glass during vibration and impacts.
• Surface Engineering for Abrasion Resistance: For premium products, label integrity is paramount. Designers engineer the partition surface to be non-abrasive. Several methods achieve this:
  • Low-friction coatings: Applying a smooth, lubricious coating to the partition’s contact surfaces minimizes scuffing. This occurs as the bottle vibrates within its cell.
  • Laminated non-abrasive facings: For the highest protection, a soft material like specialized paper or textile can be laminated onto the corrugated partition. This creates a physically non-abrasive barrier.
  • Solid Fiberboard: Solid fiberboard partitions offer an alternative to corrugated. They provide a completely smooth, rigid surface. This eliminates flute marks and minimizes label abrasion. However, they offer less cushioning.

Designing Your Folding Box for Automated Assembly

High-volume bottling operations require partitions and cases designed for automated assembly. This demands extremely precise and consistent die-cutting. The interlocking slots must prevent jams on case erecting and packing machinery. A trade-off exists between the protective complexity of a partition design and the speed of automated assembly. Simpler designs with fewer interlocking parts generally allow for higher throughput for any folding box.

Empirical Validation and Testing Protocols for Your Shipping Box

Validating a corrugated box design’s protective capability is a quantitative process. It aims to predict real-world performance. Industry-standard tests provide a baseline. However, evidence suggests they may not fully capture modern supply chain hazards. This necessitates a more data-driven approach for every shipping box.

Standardized Testing Protocols for Corrugated Box

The packaging industry uses a suite of standardized tests. These tests quantify performance. Key tests include:

• Edge Crush Test (ECT): This measures the corrugated board’s compressive strength. It indicates its potential contribution to the final box’s stacking strength.
• Box Compression Test (BCT): This measures the maximum top-to-bottom load a finished box can withstand before collapsing. It predicts performance in warehouse stacking scenarios.
• Drop Testing: This simulates impacts and shocks a package experiences from manual handling and automated sorting. Protocols like ISTA 3A and 6-AMAZON.com specify drop sequences. These involve various heights onto box faces, edges, and corners.
• Vibration Testing: This simulates vibratory forces during truck or air transport. Random vibration tables use Power Spectral Density (PSD) profiles. These replicate the frequency and amplitude characteristics of different transport modes.
• Environmental Conditioning: Before testing, packages often undergo conditioning. Controlled chambers simulate specific temperature and humidity environments. Examples include tropical, desert, or temperate conditions. These factors significantly degrade paper-based material performance.

Bridging the Gap Between Lab Testing and Field Damage

A significant challenge in packaging validation is the discrepancy between lab and field results. Passing a standardized test does not always mean damage-free delivery. Initial research found a lack of large-scale public studies. These studies would statistically link ISTA 3A or 6-AMAZON.com pass/fail results with field damage rates. This is especially true for D2C beverage shipments.

The ISTA 6-AMAZON.com protocol itself originated from Amazon’s proprietary data. This data came from field observations and customer feedback. It created a “black box” of correlation data unavailable publicly. These general simulation tests are accepted for risk mitigation. Yet, ISTA acknowledges they may not cover all transit conditions. They may also not comply with all carrier regulations. This creates discrepancies. A package passes the test but fails in the field. A hazard not adequately simulated causes this failure.

Key underrepresented failure modes in the small parcel environment include:

• Rotational and Angular Impacts: Standard vertical drop tests may not fully capture tumbling and corner-first impacts. These are common in automated sorting and rough manual handling. Research shows that linear acceleration combined with angular velocities (pitch and roll) greatly influences damage.
• Prolonged, Low-Intensity Vibration: Tests include vibration, but they may not replicate cumulative effects. Abrasion and settling occur over long-haul journeys.
• Complex Compressive Forces: In the real world, packages exist in mixed-load environments. Stacking pressure is dynamic, unpredictable, and often concentrated. This differs from the uniform top-load in standard compression tests.
• Punctures and Abrasion: Contact with other packages, sorting machinery, and conveyance systems commonly causes damage. Drop and vibration tests do not primarily address this.

Augmenting Protocols with Real-World Data and Simulation

Two main strategies emerge to bridge the gap between lab and field. These involve augmenting standard protocols and leveraging advanced simulation.

• Data-Driven Custom Protocols: IoT-enabled journey loggers represent the most significant advancement. These sensors are placed inside shipments. They collect continuous, high-fidelity data. This data includes shock events, vibration profiles, temperature, humidity, and angular velocity. This happens throughout the actual distribution journey. This real-world data creates “tailor-made test protocols.” These protocols are far more representative of a specific supply chain’s hazards than generic standards. This allows a closed-loop, iterative process. Field data informs a custom lab test. This test validates the packaging design. It leads to continuous optimization.
• Advanced Simulation (FEA): Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is becoming a predictive design tool. It moves beyond just validation. Analysts create detailed virtual models of packaging and its contents. They simulate performance under various dynamic loads. For effectiveness, these models use homogenization techniques. This efficiently represents the complex corrugated structure. They also employ advanced orthotropic, non-linear material models. These capture the true behavior of paperboard. FEA model validation occurs by correlating simulation results with empirical data. This includes standard tests (ECT, BCT) and advanced measurements. Digital Image Correlation (DIC) analyzes buckling. Scanning Laser Doppler Vibrometry (SLDV) performs high-resolution vibration analysis.

Combining empirical testing, informed by real-world sensor data, with predictive FEA simulations allows us to move beyond simple pass/fail. It helps develop a deeper, more accurate understanding of a package’s true performance limits.

Application-Specific Design Optimization for Your Folding Box

A “one-size-fits-all” approach to beer packaging proves ineffective and inefficient. Designers must strategically optimize the folding box for specific distribution channels. This includes Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) versus B2B retail. They also consider the primary packaging format, such as glass bottles versus aluminum cans.

Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) Versus Bulk Retail (B2B) Shipping Box Needs

The D2C small parcel channel presents fundamentally different hazards and requirements than the B2B palletized freight channel.

• Direct-to-Consumer (D2C): This channel has many touchpoints. It involves automated sorting and manual handling. This leads to a much higher damage risk from drops, impacts, and vibration. Some reports indicate general small parcel damage rates as high as 10%. D2C packaging prioritizes single-unit integrity and shock absorption. Designs often include robust internal cushioning. Examples are full-height partitions or molded pulp trays. These isolate each primary container. Liquids carry a higher recognized risk. Amazon’s SIOC program mandates testing for such products in a certified ISTA 6 lab. This highlights the need for rigorous validation. The unboxing experience is also a key D2C marketing consideration. It often requires high-quality graphics. The design must be both protective and aesthetically pleasing. This applies to every shipping box.
• Bulk Retail / Business-to-Business (B2B): Logistics efficiency defines this channel. Breweries typically ship beer on pallets directly to distribution centers or retailers. The main packaging challenge involves stacking strength and palletization efficiency. The design must maximize the Box Compression Test (BCT) value. This withstands the immense weight of a full pallet stack in a warehouse. Stacks can be several meters high. The focus here is on robust box design, like Full Overlap (FOL). Vertical-flute partitions contribute to load-bearing. Optimizing the case footprint ensures a perfect fit on a standard pallet. This eliminates overhang and maximizes stability.

Glass Bottles Versus Aluminum Cans Packaging Considerations

The primary container’s physical properties determine the secondary packaging’s specific protective requirements.

• Glass Bottles: Impact and shock primarily risk glass fracture. The packaging system must absorb and dissipate impact energy. This prevents g-forces transmitted to the bottle from exceeding its fragility threshold. It uses:
  • Cushioning: Thicker flute profiles (B/C-flute) and internal components create void space. They act as shock absorbers.
  • Immobilization: Full-height partitions securely hold bottles. This prevents bottle-to-bottle contact, a major cause of breakage. Die-cut scallops and chamfers protect the vulnerable neck area.
  • Abrasion Prevention: For premium products, protecting labels from scuffing during transit vibration is crucial. Surface-engineered partitions provide this.
  • FEA Optimization: Advanced FEA proactively optimizes glass bottle design. A parametric model helps manufacturers reduce glass weight. It also ensures the bottle withstands loads like internal carbonation pressure and vertical top-load. This shortens analysis time from weeks to hours.
• Aluminum Cans: Puncture, crushing, and abrasion primarily risk aluminum cans. Cans are less susceptible to catastrophic fracture from drops. However, sharp objects or concentrated pressure easily dent or puncture them.
  • Puncture Resistance: The corrugated box specification must prioritize puncture resistance. This may involve heavier-weight linerboard or double-wall construction.
  • Crush Resistance: The overall structure must prevent localized crushing. This damages cans in the middle of a case. It requires sufficient BCT and rigid internal structures.
  • Abrasion: Constant vibration during transit can cause cans to rub against each other or internal packaging. This potentially wears through the thin printed layer or even the aluminum. Smooth internal surfaces and tight packing minimize this movement.

FEA plays a crucial role in predictive optimization for both glass bottles and aluminum cans. Workflows like Smurfit Kappa’s “PaperToBox” use simulation. They run virtual Design of Experiments (DOE) on different paper and flute combinations. This optimizes specific performance targets like bending strength or BCT before any physical prototypes exist.

Competitive Benchmarking: Corrugated Box Against Alternatives

Optimized corrugated box packaging offers a versatile and effective solution. However, benchmarking it against primary alternatives remains essential. These alternatives include molded pulp and reusable rigid polymer crates (e.g., HDPE). This analysis uses a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) framework. This framework extends beyond the initial purchase price. It includes all costs throughout the packaging lifecycle.

Evaluation Matrix: Corrugated Versus Molded Pulp Versus HDPE Crates

导出到 Google 表格

Detailed Analysis of Packaging Alternatives

• Molded Pulp: This material offers a compelling alternative, especially for D2C shipments of glass bottles. Its ability to mold into custom-fit cavities provides exceptional shock protection. It reportedly reduces damage rates for fragile products to as low as 0.5%. Its significant advantage lies in economics and logistics. Using low-cost recycled paper and its lightweight, nestable design leads to dramatic savings. These include shipping fees and warehouse space. One beverage company reportedly saved $1.2 million in logistics by switching to molded pulp.
• Reusable HDPE Crates: Traditionally, closed-loop B2B distribution used HDPE crates. They offer unparalleled durability and compression protection. However, their TCO and sustainability profile depend on critical variables. The system requires massive capital investment for the crate pool and industrial washing equipment. Operational costs for reverse logistics—transporting empty crates back to the brewery—are substantial. These costs increase with distance. The FEFCO LCA study questions the environmental superiority of plastic crates in many real-world scenarios. It suggests that they often do not achieve the high number of trips needed to reach a “break-even” point on carbon impact.
• Optimized Corrugated: Advanced corrugated solutions strike a powerful balance. They offer highly customizable protection. Engineers can design them for specific threats. While single-use, their TCO is predictable. They avoid the complex, costly reverse logistics chain of reusable crates. The high recycling rate of corrugated in most developed markets provides a strong circularity profile. Furthermore, innovations in bio-based coatings and adhesives create pathways for compostability. This offers an alternative end-of-life that aligns with organic waste streams. A case study with Nortura showed a 44% increase in packs per transport. This happened after switching from plastic crates to corrugated boxes. It highlights the cube efficiency benefits of a single-use system.

Conclusion of Benchmarking: The choice of system highly depends on context. For high-volume, short-distance, closed-loop B2B systems, HDPE crates work effectively. For D2C shipments where premium shock protection and logistics efficiency are paramount, molded pulp is a formidable contender. However, for a broad range of applications across both B2B and D2C channels, optimized corrugated box packaging often offers the most versatile, cost-effective, and sustainable balance of performance characteristics.

Horizon Scanning: Innovations in Materials, Design, and Circularity

The corrugated packaging sector is experiencing rapid innovation. Demands for greater performance, sustainability, and intelligence drive this. This section explores emerging developments. They will redefine best practices in beer packaging.

Material Advancements and Lightweighting for Corrugated Box

The pursuit of sustainability drives innovation. It focuses on both material composition and reduction.

• Advanced Bio-Materials: Beyond PLA, research accelerates on materials like lignin and PHA. Lignin’s scalability as a biorefinery co-product could make it a cost-effective, high-performance component. This applies to both coatings and adhesives. PHA, with its higher thermal stability, opens new application areas. Its cost could fall as production methods shift to using waste streams as feedstock.
• Lightweighting: This principle involves using less material without compromising performance. It is a key goal. Advanced FEA modeling optimizes structures to achieve this. Material innovation also plays a role. An example appears in primary packaging. Vetropack developed a returnable glass bottle one-third lighter than its predecessor. This reduced transport costs and CO2 emissions. Similar principles apply to corrugated box board. Stronger fibers and optimized flute geometries reduce basis weight.

Intelligent Packaging and Advanced Modeling

Integrating data and digital tools transforms packaging design. It shifts from a reactive to a predictive discipline.

• Integrated Sensors: Journey loggers for custom test protocols are just the beginning. The future lies in intelligent packaging. It includes low-cost, integrated sensors. These provide real-time data on shock, vibration, temperature, humidity, and even atmospheric composition. This data monitors product quality throughout the supply chain. It also provides invaluable feedback for continuous design improvement.
• Predictive FEA and Digital Twins: Finite Element Analysis (FEA) evolves into a cornerstone of proactive design. Companies create a “digital twin” of a package. They simulate its entire lifecycle performance. This allows rapid virtual prototyping and optimization. Parametric modeling, coupled with software like Isight, enables automated Design of Experiments (DOE). This explores thousands of design variations. It optimizes multiple objectives simultaneously, like weight reduction and compression strength. This pushes the industry toward “right-first-time” design. It drastically reduces development costs and time-to-market.

The Evolution of Circular Economy Models

The concept of circularity expands beyond simple recycling. It now encompasses more sophisticated models of reuse and biological cycling.

• Dual-Track End-of-Life: For bio-coated boards, the ideal future is a “dual-track” system. Packaging would be fully repulpable in a standard paper recycling stream. It would also be fully certified for commercial compostability. This provides maximum flexibility based on local waste management infrastructure.
• Reusable Corrugated Systems: Developing reusable corrugated containers (RCCs) presents a truly innovative concept. While challenging, this model combines corrugated benefits (lightweight, collapsible, brandable) with a reusable asset’s lifecycle.
  • Design for Durability: Success requires significant design enhancements. RCCs are engineered for 4-10 use cycles. They incorporate robust water-resistant coatings, reinforced handholes, and durable locking tabs.
  • Reverse Logistics and Tracking: Economic viability depends on a highly efficient reverse logistics loop. This requires a high return rate (over 95% is achievable with deposit schemes). Technology for managing the asset pool is also necessary. Patented placard label holders and embedded RFID tags are key enabling technologies for tracking and processing.
  • Competitive Positioning: Compared to rigid plastic crates, RCCs offer compelling advantages. Their collapsibility dramatically improves return transport efficiency and cost. Their superior surface allows high-quality branding. This can be refreshed each cycle, a key marketing advantage.

While still developing, reusable corrugated systems represent a paradigm shift. They challenge the long-held assumption that fiber-based packaging must be single-use. They offer a path to truly circular and operationally efficient distribution.

Conclusion

The evolution of packaging solutions for beer products highlights a dynamic interplay of scientific advancement and market demand. Our comprehensive analysis reveals that advanced corrugated box structures stand as a cornerstone in this evolution. They balance superior protection, cost-effectiveness, and environmental responsibility. From the meticulous selection of linerboards and innovative bio-adhesives to the precise engineering of flute profiles and internal partitions, every aspect contributes to a robust protective system.

We have emphasized the critical need to bridge the gap between traditional laboratory testing and the realities of modern distribution channels. Integrating real-world sensor data and sophisticated Finite Element Analysis (FEA) empowers manufacturers to create packaging solutions that are not only theoretically sound but also demonstrably effective in diverse, challenging environments like Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) shipping.

Furthermore, a multi-criteria benchmarking against alternatives like molded pulp and reusable HDPE crates underscores the inherent strengths of optimized corrugated. While each option has its niche, the corrugated box consistently offers a versatile and often more sustainable total cost of ownership, particularly when considering the complexities of reverse logistics.

Looking ahead, innovations in lightweighting, advanced bio-materials, intelligent integrated sensors, and the burgeoning field of reusable corrugated systems promise to further enhance the capabilities and sustainability profile of this essential packaging material. The future of beer packaging, indeed, rests on a holistic, data-driven approach. This approach leverages material science and structural ingenuity. It creates solutions that are protective, economically viable, and verifiably sustainable, ensuring that every bottle and can reaches its destination in optimal condition.